Better decisions start when AI models disagree.
Submit any question. Your configured AI models debate it blind, no coordination, no consensus pressure. You get a structured map of where they agree, where they diverge, and where you need to decide.
One AI. One opinion. Zero accountability.
The Confidence Trap
Single AI models hallucinate with full confidence. You can't tell a solid answer from a fabrication.
The Brand Bias
You trust Claude because it's Anthropic, or GPT because it's OpenAI. Brand deference lets weak reasoning hide behind a logo.
The Black Box
You get an answer. You don't get to see how it was reached, what was considered, or what was missed.
The Consensus Debate Protocol (CDP)
A structured pipeline that produces information no single model can generate.
Think of it as structured peer review for AI outputs — your models cross-examine each other before you see a result.
Submit
Ask any question — factual, normative, a proposal, prediction, or idea. The platform classifies it and selects the best model combination for the topic.
- Input types: factual, normative, proposal, prediction, brainstorm, evaluation, belief
- Optional grounding: web search or uploaded documents anchor all models to the same evidence
Debate
Your configured AI models respond independently and simultaneously — no model sees any other's response. Identities are anonymized throughout.
- No coordination, no shared context — convergence independence is the strongest trust signal
- Models then challenge, support, or refine each other's specific claims across deliberation rounds
Synthesize
An adjudicator evaluates the debate and compiles everything into the four-part output — a structured map of what's solid, contested, and unresolved.
- Consensus score decomposed into 4 visible components — not a black box number
- Every claim tagged with confidence spread, model attribution, and evidence cited
The Four-Part Output
Strong Ground
Claims all models converged on. Blind agreements at the top, later adoptions below. Each claim tagged with confidence spread and evidence cited.
“Here's what you can rely on.”
Fault Lines
Precise points of disagreement, expressed as conditionals. Tagged with which models are on which side, whether empirical or normative.
“Here's where the uncertainty lives.”
Blind Spots
Claims only one model raised but others validated after seeing them. Tagged with origin, validation status, and significance.
“Here's what you would have missed asking just one AI.”
Your Call
Decision points where AI knowledge runs out entirely. Classified as: values decisions, risk appetite, priorities, or genuine unknowables.
“Here's where you bring your own judgment.”
Start free. Scale when you're ready.
Free
Start exploring structured debate
- 5 debates per day
- 2 rounds per debate
- Up to 3 AI debaters
- Smart model routing
- Algorithmic consensus scoring
- Watermarked output
- 1 API key
Managed
For professionals who need clarity
- Unlimited debates
- Up to 4 rounds per debate
- Up to 5 AI debaters
- All models including Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro
- LLM adjudicator committee
- Full four-part debate output
- JSON audit trail export
- No watermark
- 2 API keys
Enterprise
Tailored for your organization
- Unlimited debates
- Up to 10 rounds
- Up to 10 AI debaters
- Configurable models (BYOK option)
- On-premise or private cloud deployment
- Ephemeral mode (zero data stored)
- EU AI Act, SOC2, HIPAA-ready
- Compliance audit export
- Dedicated support + SLA
All payments processed on web. No app store markup. Same model as ChatGPT and Perplexity.
Stop trusting. Start verifying.
Run your first debate in 10 seconds. No API keys. No setup.