Accountability infrastructure for autonomous agents

DebateTalk verifies AI agent reasoning, decisions, and actions before they execute, collaborate, or pay. Built for A2A workflows and x402 payments, it provides evidence trails, debate-based validation, approvals, and audit logs — so autonomous agents can work together, justify outcomes, and transact with accountability

Backed by MIT/DeepMind research
Cross-company AI neutrality
Full audit trail
EU AI Act ready

Expert Perspectives by Default

DebateTalk now features specialized AI roles. From Legal Strategists to Medical Expert Checkers, our debaters embody professional expertise to provide the most balanced answers.

Legal Counsel
Legal Counsel
Business Strategist
Business Strategist
Medical Expert
Medical Expert
Software Architect
Software Architect
Meet All the Roles
Now Publicly Available

DebateTalk in your pocket.

The full power of multi-model AI debates is now native on mobile. Run debates, ask follow-up questions, and explore consensus on the go.

  • Real-time Stream Engine

    Watch elite models debate and synthesize answers live on your phone.

  • Fully Synchronized History

    Access your debate history, API usage, and settings across web and mobile.

  • Google Sign-In Enabled

    Secure, one-tap authentication to keep your data protected.

Download DebateTalk App

Get it on Google Play
Compatible with Android 9.0 and above.

One AI = One opinion = Zero accountability.

The Confidence Trap

Single AI models hallucinate with full confidence. You can't tell a solid answer from a fabrication.

The Brand Bias

You trust Claude because it's Anthropic, or GPT because it's OpenAI. Brand deference lets weak reasoning hide behind a logo.

The Black Box

You get an answer. You don't get to see how it was reached, what was considered, or what was missed.

The Consensus Debate Protocol (CDP)

A structured pipeline that produces information no single model can generate.

Think of it as structured peer review for AI outputs — your models cross-examine each other before you see a result.

01

Submit

Ask any question — factual, normative, a proposal, prediction, or idea. The platform classifies it and selects the best model combination for the topic.

  • Input types: factual, normative, proposal, prediction, brainstorm, evaluation, belief
  • Optional grounding: web search or uploaded documents anchor all models to the same evidence
02

Debate

Your configured AI models respond independently and simultaneously — no model sees any other's response. Identities are anonymized throughout.

  • No coordination, no shared context — convergence independence is the strongest trust signal
  • Models then challenge, support, or refine each other's specific claims across deliberation rounds
03

Synthesize

An adjudicator evaluates the debate and compiles everything into the four-part output — a structured map of what's solid, contested, and unresolved.

  • Consensus score decomposed into 4 visible components — not a black box number
  • Every claim tagged with confidence spread, model attribution, and evidence cited

The Four-Part Output

Strong Ground

Claims all models converged on. Blind agreements at the top, later adoptions below. Each claim tagged with confidence spread and evidence cited.

Here's what you can rely on.

Fault Lines

Precise points of disagreement, expressed as conditionals. Tagged with which models are on which side, whether empirical or normative.

Here's where the uncertainty lives.

Blind Spots

Claims only one model raised but others validated after seeing them. Tagged with origin, validation status, and significance.

Here's what you would have missed asking just one AI.

Your Call

Decision points where AI knowledge runs out entirely. Classified as: values decisions, risk appetite, priorities, or genuine unknowables.

Here's where you bring your own judgment.

Available now on npm

Bring structured debate into any AI workflow.

The DebateTalk MCP server and CLI let you run multi-model debates from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, or your terminal, without leaving your workflow.

MCP (Model Context Protocol) lets AI assistants call external tools. Our MCP server wraps the full debate engine (blind rounds, deliberation, consensus checking) into a single run_debate tool. The CLI gives you the same power from the terminal.

Both ship as @debatetalk/mcp on npm. One package, two interfaces.

MCP Client Compatibility

ClientMCP SupportExperience
Claude Code
Full
Round-by-round progress in terminal
Cursor / Windsurf / Zed
Full
IDE-native tool call
Claude Desktop
Full
Desktop app integration
Cline / Roo Code
Full
VS Code agent integration
Goose (Block)
Full
Open-source agent support
Claude.ai Web
Not yet
Use web app directly
ChatGPT
Not yet
Not MCP-compatible
mcp-config.json
{
"mcpServers": {
"debatetalk": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@debatetalk/mcp"],
"env": {
"DEBATETALK_API_KEY": "dt_your_key_here"
}
}
}
}

Start free. Scale when you're ready.

Free

$0

Start exploring structured debate

Join Free
  • 5 debates per day
  • 2 rounds per debate
  • Up to 3 AI debaters
  • Smart model routing
  • Algorithmic consensus scoring
  • Watermarked output
  • 1 API key
Most Popular

Managed

Pay as you go

For professionals who need clarity

Start Managed
  • Unlimited debates
  • Up to 4 rounds per debate
  • Up to 5 AI debaters
  • All models including Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini Pro
  • LLM adjudicator committee
  • Full four-part debate output
  • JSON audit trail export
  • No watermark
  • 2 API keys

Enterprise

Custom

Tailored for your organization

Contact Sales
  • Unlimited debates
  • Up to 10 rounds
  • Up to 10 AI debaters
  • Configurable models (BYOK option)
  • On-premise or private cloud deployment
  • Ephemeral mode (zero data stored)
  • EU AI Act, SOC2, HIPAA-ready
  • Compliance audit export
  • Dedicated support + SLA

All payments processed on web. No app store markup. Same model as ChatGPT and Perplexity.

Stop trusting. Start verifying.

Run your first debate in 10 seconds. No API keys. No setup.